![]() A certain Crete, possible eponym of the island of Crete, was also called one of the Hesperides. Their names were: Aegle, Erythea, Arethusa, Hestia, Hespera, Hesperusa, and Hespereia. He believed that they were the seven Hesperides, nymph daughters of Atlas and Hesperis. Petrus Apianus attributed to these stars a mythical connection of their own. A pyxis has Hippolyte, Mapsaura, and Thetis. An ancient vase painting attests the following names as four: Asterope, Chrysothemis, Hygieia, and Lipara on another seven names as Aiopis, Antheia, Donakis, Calypso, Mermesa, Nelisa, and Tara. However, the historiographer Diodorus in his account stated that they are seven in number with no information of their names. Apollodorus gives the number of the Hesperides also as four, namely: Aigle, Erytheia, Hesperia (or Hesperie), and Arethusa while Fulgentius named them as Aegle, Hesperie, Medusa, and Arethusa. In addition, Hesperia, and Arethusa, the so-called "ox-eyed Hesperethusa". ![]() Hesiod says that these "clear-voiced Hesperides", daughters of Nyx (night), guarded the golden apples beyond Ocean in the far west of the world, gives the number of the Hesperides as four, and their names as: Aigle (or Aegle, "dazzling light"), Erytheia (or Erytheis), Hesperia ("sunset glow") whose name refers to the colour of the setting sun, red, yellow, or gold and lastly Arethusa. In another source, they are named Aegle, Arethusa, and Hesperethusa, the three daughters of Hesperus. Hyginus in his preface to the Fabulae names them as Aegle, Hesperie, and Aerica. Apollonius of Rhodes gives the number of three with their names as Aigle, Erytheis, and Hespere (or Hespera). Nevertheless, among the names given to them, though never all at once, there were either three, four, or seven Hesperides. Personally, I find it pretty impressive that it performs as well as these runtimes despite not having a JIT compiler.The Garden of the Hesperides by Frederick, Lord Leighton, 1892. I'm pretty sure Shaw's written more benchmarks, but as the README explains, it's really hard to tell what the performance characteristics of a language are without writing a larger application. ![]() So far the largest applications written with MiniVM are Paka, a self-hosted language similar to Lua that targets MiniVM os49, an operating system built on Paka/MiniVM in the spirit of lisp machines and xori, an online playground for the language.Įdit: to address your edit, the the Tree benchmark starts small, but grows exponentially (the graph is logarithmic). The final runs of the benchmark take about 15 seconds to run, and are run 10 times per language, at which point startup time is no longer a large factor. ![]() The fib test compares both luajit with the JIT on and JIT off: as MiniVM is not JIT'd, I think that this is a fair comparison to make.Ī snapshot is a the entire state of a program at a single moment in time. Continuations are basically exposed snapshots, i.e. taking a snapshot, storing it in a variable, doing some work, and then 'calling' the snapshot to return to an earlier point. Continuations allow you to implement a naive version of single-shot delimited continuations - coroutines! This can be very useful for modeling concurrency.Īside from coroutines and continuations, snapshots are neat for distributed computing: spin up a vm, take a snapshot, and replicate it over the network. You could also send snapshots of different tasks to other computers to execute. In the context of edge computing, you could snapshot the program once it's 'warm' to cut back on VM startup time. Snapshots allow you to peek into your program. Imagine a debugger that takes snapshots on breakpoints, lets you to inspect the stack and heap, and replay the program forward from a given point in a deterministic manner. You could also send a snapshot to a friend so they can run an application from a given point on their machine. If you do snapshots + live reloading there are tons of other things you can do (e.g. live patching and replaying of functions while debugging). ![]() Out of curiosity, are you planning on (progressively, slowly) rolling your own JIT, or using something like DynASM ( ), libFirm ( ), or some other preexisting thing (eg ) in the space?įWIW, I understand that LuaJIT gets some of its insane real-world performance from a JIT and VM design that's effectively shrink-wrapped around Lua semantics/intrinsics - it's not general-purpose. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |